Top 10 deficiencies in new application for Certification of suitability
The following table presents a detailed analysis of the top ten deficiencies commonly encountered during the Certification of Suitability application process within pharmaceutical manufacturing (Source: EDQM). It meticulously addresses complex challenges, from insufficient product specifications to potential contamination risks and the intricacies of risk assessment.
For each identified issue, the table describes the implications on the final product and suggests recommended actions, including consultations with experts and specific assessments. It serves as a critical quality control tool to ensure the safety and efficacy of pharmaceutical products.
| # | Deficiency | Check points for CoS and DMF (What is expected) | How Veeprho can help you (Solution offered) | Link to EDQM guidline |
| 1 | Poor description of the manufacturing process | Appropriate synthetic flow diagram representing all isolated non-isolated intermediates as well as starting materials including recovered material along with clear process description | Expert support to draft the comprehensive flow diagram and inclusive process details | View EDQM Guideline |
| 2 | Poorly justified specifications for intermediates and starting materials | Define suitable acceptance criteria for impurities in starting material and intermediates. Identification of major impurities and their carry over. | Identification and characterization of major impurities in SM and intermediates. Computation purge assessment for carryover studies | View EDQM Guideline |
| 3 | Absence of discussion about potential mutagenic impurities in the API | Mutagenicity assessment of all actual and potential impurities of final API as well as associated with staring material and intermediate followed by classification to justify the limits as per ICH M7. Control strategy for genotoxic impurities as per option 3 and 4 in ICH M7 | Our computational (Q)SAR based toxicology for prediction of a Mutagenicity & Carcinogenicity of impurities followed by classification as per recommendation of ICH M7. We also support for recommendation of limits of impurities. Purge assessment to support Option 3 & 4. | View EDQM Guideline |
| 4 | Same as 2 | Same as 2 | Same as 2 | View EDQM Guideline |
| 5 | Inadequate acceptance criteria for raw materials (incl. recovered materials) | Accurately designed specification of raw material including recovered raw material. | Report on risk assessment for nitrosamine as per EMA and FDA requirements followed by support on confirmatory test. Identification of degradation products and risk assessment Acceptable Intake determination by computational read across based on surrogate as per EMA & FDA | View EDQM Guideline |
| 6 | Reprocessing and recovery of raw materials are inadequately addressed | Detailed description of reprocessing and recovery. | Support for risk assessment of impurities due to reprocessing | View EDQM Guideline |
| 7 | Deficient risk assessment related to Nitrosamines | Risk assessment of Nitrosamine formation with respect to manufacturing process and raw material, reagents used in synthesis. Also due to degradation products and carry over of amine impurities in drug product (including NDSRI) | Report on risk assessment for nitrosamine as per EMA and FDA requirement followed by support on confirmatory test. Identification of degradation products and risk assessment Acceptable Intake determination by computational read across based on surrogate as per EMA & FDA | View EDQM Guideline |
| 8 | Failure to adequately address the origin, fate, and carryover of impurities | Discussion for carry over of impurities and precursor of toxic impurities to final API and formulation product for non pharmacopeial impurities (specific to process and materials used) and degradation product | Support on complete assessment of identification of process specific impurities and degradation products followed by risk assessment and purge/carry over studies | View EDQM Guideline |
| 9 | Deficient discussion on residual solvents | Provide appropriate LoD/LOQ for solvents which are not detected. Discussion of solvents as byproduct. Risk assessment of Class 1 solvents | Risk assessment report for residual solvents including class 1 solvents. | View EDQM Guideline |
| 10 | Failure to suitably identify starting materials | Carry over of toxic precursors and reagents to final API | Our expert will guide you to define appropriate starting material and their risk assessment | View EDQM Guideline |
Source: TOP TEN DEFICIENCIES in New Applications for Certificates of Suitability for chemical purity (EDQM)
Recognizing the importance of proactive measures, we advocate for strategic consultations with industry experts and the implementation of specialized assessments.
Designed as an essential tool for quality assurance, this table aims to reinforce the commitment to excellence and safety in pharmaceutical products.
By sharing our insights, we strive to foster a culture of continuous improvement and collaboration across the pharmaceutical industry.
Looking for further details or have inquiries?
Reach out to us, and we will assist you in identifying and averting shortcomings.